Q Module 3Critical Thinking Assignment Suicide Concern/Welfare Check As you enter into or continue working within the field of psychology and other helping fields (e.g. Social Work, Teaching, etc.) you might find yourself having to respond to an individual who is presenting with concerns about harming themselves or possibly someone else. Often when we encounter these situations, we might not know what to do or how to respond. This assignment is to assist in preparing you and your classmates on how to respond if you encounter one of those difficult situations. You will be expected to select a work or occupational setting that you might be interested in working in and research the steps that you would either be mandated to (or should) follow if you were to report suicidal/homicidal ideation, a suicide/homicide attempt, or request a welfare check due to substantiated concern. After collecting the required information, you will create a quick (2-3 minute) how-to video explaining the step-by-step process. You may attach any forms or helpful handouts that you may find in the process. If you cannot make the video, please submit the script of the video you would have made with all of the information required. Refer to this video for additional information on what a Police Welfare Check is. Instructions: You will be expected to select a state, administration, governing body, and worksite or role (example “Oregon, Providence Hospital, American Psychology Association, Hospital Nurse”) and then research in reporting process involved if you were to report suicidal/homicidal ideation, a suicide/homicide attempt, or request a welfare check due to substantiated concern. After collecting the information, create a 2-3 minute how-to video explaining the step-by-step reporting process. Any script submissions should be 1-3 pages in length and conform to APA guidelines in the CSU Global Writing Center (Links to an external site.). Make sure to cite any included sources according to the APA guidelines. The CSU Global Library is a good place to find these references. Rubric Module 3 6 CT Module 3 6 CT Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements 10 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 8 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 6 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 4 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent 10 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources. 8 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge. 6 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge. 4 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis 15 to >12.0 pts Meets Expectation Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the information given. 12 to >9.0 pts Approaches Expectation Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation. 9 to >6.0 pts Below Expectation Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation. 6 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given. 15 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources / Examples 5 to >4.0 pts Meets Expectation Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. 4 to >3.0 pts Approaches Expectation Sources or examples meet required criteria but are less?than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. 3 to >2.0 pts Below Expectation Sources or examples don't meet required criteria and are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. 2 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course are clearly deficient. 5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar, and style 5 to >4.0 pts Meets Expectation Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling. 4 to >3.0 pts Approaches Expectation Project is fairly well organized and written and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling. 3 to >2.0 pts Below Expectation Project is poorly organized and does not follow proper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling. 2 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Project is not organized or well written and is not in proper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling. 5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style 5 to >4.0 pts Meets Expectation Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU Global resources on APA citation style, with no more than one significant error. 4 to >3.0 pts Approaches Expectation Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global resources on APA citation style, with no more than two to three significant errors. 3 to >2.0 pts Below Expectation Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global resources on APA citation style, with four to five significant errors. 2 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global resources on APA citation style, with more than five significant errors. 5 pts Total Points: 50 PreviousNext